[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ink and paper analysis?

To: <voynich@xxxxxxxx>, reeds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jim Reeds), "diane.cousteau" <Diane.cousteau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ink and paper analysis?
From: John Bush <jebush@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:56:41 -0800
In-reply-to: <1010322120447.ZM3748569@fry.research.att.com>
References: <"diane.cousteau" <Diane.cousteau@wanadoo.fr> <001001c098fe$c7179320$5fd61b3f@earthlink.net> <002901c0b09d$7db76960$5a1af9c1@compaqcustomer> <3AB162CA.DB25A92A@alphalink.com.au> <003101c0b2ef$94f843c0$a819f9c1@compaqcustomer>

At 12:04 PM 3/22/01 -0500, Jim Reeds wrote:

   Dating of parchment,
for instance,  cannot be reliably done by C-14 analysis, someone
told us early on.

Yes, I recall reading this in disbelief on someone's VMS page. Has anyone followed up on this with an expert, or is it just someone's opinion?

John Bush

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ink and paper analysis?
  - From: Adams Douglas

References:
- Hello!
  - From: diane.cousteau
- Re: Hello!
  - From: Jacques Guy
- Ink and paper analysis?
  - From: diane.cousteau
- Re: Ink and paper analysis?
  - From: Jim Reeds

Prev by Date: Re: Ink and paper analysis?
Next by Date: Re: Ink and paper analysis?
Previous by thread: Re: Ink and paper analysis?
Next by thread: Re: Ink and paper analysis?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread