[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gallows G characters
- To: voynich@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Gallows G characters
- From: Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 09:24:15 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: reeds@research.att.com
- In-reply-to: <001901c1c0bf$f7872400$e5ac6395@mshome.net>
John hit the nail on the head, when he wrote about the
Eva transcription alphabet:
> [...] but the one benefit of it is that everyone can
> understand which characters you are referring
> to.. I follow that your G gallows are either one of
> the f/p gallows, and your H must be either of the
> t/k gallows -- But I can't guess what a K
> gallows is then...
I know that Glen can't use Eva for his analysis
since he prefers to treat some characters which
are transcribed as one in Eva as different ones.
Absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Glen:
In particular, this is the Eva character 'sh' which is
Currier-Z, and which you call a picnic table, even
though, traditionally, the picnic table is a rare
character which Currier did not transcribe, and
which is Eva-x.
More people will be able to understand posts on
this list if one uses (even if only in
parentheses) the Eva, Frogguy or Currier alphabets
which almost everone on the list will be familiar
with.
> I also have to ask - even though they are very
> rare -- what of split
> gallows? EVA doesn't handle them well either -
This is true. The alphabet is used for all characters
which occur at least 10 times in the MS (according
to our transcription) and everything else (including
the split gallows) is 'demoted' to a numerical
code (of which there are many more than the set
of normal characters.)
Cheers, Rene
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball
http://sports.yahoo.com