[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

VMs: Re: John Dee's "Tuba Veneris"...?

To: voynich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Voynich Ms. mailing list) "Nick Pelling" <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: VMs: Re: John Dee's "Tuba Veneris"...?
From: "David R. Jones" <jdnolan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:54:03 -0700
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020627103512.034a1560@pop3.blueyonder.co.uk> <NFBBJIELILDIPGOLKHAFCEDCCFAA.glenclaston@attbi.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020626212300.01f98460@pop3.blueyonder.co.uk> <5.1.0.14.0.20020704173648.03410de0@pop3.blueyonder.co.uk>
Sender: owner-voynich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Just a quick thought: when referring to John Dee's early "Tuba Veneris"
> (Warburg MS FBH 510)...

I don't think many believe that the Tuba is genuinely Dee.  I have examined
some samples and the details (writing, illustrations etc.) are unlike any of
the Dee MSS with which I am familiar.  Classic psuedoepigraphy in my
opinion.

Follow-Ups:
- VMs: Re: John Dee's "Tuba Veneris"...?
  - From: Nick Pelling

References:
- VMs: John Dee's "Tuba Veneris"...?
  - From: Nick Pelling

Prev by Date: VMs: RE: John Dee's "Tuba Veneris"...?
Next by Date: VMs: Dee and crowns with a cross (f72v3)
Previous by thread: VMs: Re: John Dee's "Tuba Veneris"...?
Next by thread: VMs: Re: John Dee's "Tuba Veneris"...?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread