[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

VMs: Re: Gallows - diverting the eye?



You have made an interesting observation. While I am certainly no expert in penmanship, it may be that the scribe, on occasion, used two short vertical strokes as place holders, until the structure of some of the more elaborate gallows could be figured out. It seems that the four basic gallows structures, however, were written in two strokes, a single vertical stroke top to bottom either by itself or to the left of parallel strokes, followed by the finishing stroke beginning at the top of the initial vertical stroke. There may or may not be a loop on the top left, but there is always a loop to the top right in these four basic gallows. The power, strength, and beauty that the gallows add to the manuscript is significant, even with understanding the underlying interpretation of the text. It seems very improbable to me that the tops of the gallows were added at a later date. Even the very first stroke in the manuscript is the vertical stroke of a gallows character. The type of pen, ink, hand of the scribe, and texture of the vellum would also have contributed to the appearance of the gallows. In the final assessment, it would probably be proven that the same black ink was used throughout the manuscript for the major portion of the text (though it would be quite interesting if there were different mixtures of black ink used).
 
Regards,
Dana Scott    
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Grove
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:39 AM
To: voynich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: VMs: RE: Gallows - diverting the eye?
 

Thanks for the reply, and the interesting table of characters. It looks to me very much as though the alphabet was designed for ease of writing. However the point I was trying to make about the gallows was that they often look as though they were written not in a single stroke for each 'leg' as you suggest (and as would seem sensible for speed of writing), but with each leg drawn in two parts with a break about half way down. It's as though they were originally drawn as two (or one) small 'i' strokes and the top halves of the verticals drawn in separately. Sometimes it looks as though the bottom half is more like a 'c' that is then overdrawn by the tall vertical.

I've attached some examples taken from F106r (top row) and F82v (bottom row). They show some of the kinks, breaks and overdrawing that I referred to. There are many more examples in the VMS!

Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but it seems there must have been a reason for drawing the characters in this way.

Regards,
Jon.