VMs: RE: Paradigms Regained

["GC" <glenclaston@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dennis wrote:
> 	Jacques revived one Voynichese paradigm.  I think that
> all the
> paradigms bear on the question of what is or not a
> "glyph".  A prefix,
> infix, and suffix might be, in each case, a "glyph".

>From a different angle, these "prefixes", "infixes", "and
suffixes" may be composed of glyphs, not compose a glyph.  It's
more likely in my mind that they are less conjugational, root or
declension oriented and far more systemic in nature.  IMHO these
paradigms represent an artifact of a system, and are no more
glyphs themselves than -er, -est, -ing, etc.  Just an opinion.

GC