[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

VMs: Re: glyph = combination -- not "compilation" (was: Weirdoes, ligatures)

To: voynich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Voynich Ms. mailing list)
Subject: VMs: Re: glyph = combination -- not "compilation" (was: Weirdoes, ligatures)
From: Gabriel Landini <G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:13:05 +0100
In-reply-to: <200210072230.g97MU2F1015432@mail3.alphalink.com.au>
Organization: The University of Birmingham, UK.
References: <200210072230.g97MU2F1015432@mail3.alphalink.com.au>
Reply-to: G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-voynich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.4.2

On Monday 07 October 2002 11:29 pm, Jacques Guy wrote:
> 07/10/02 08:23:05, "John Grove" <4groves@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>There is at least one occurrence of a weirdo which
> >>is <en> connected.
> >
> >	That would be the '@' sign would it not?
>
> It does look like an unfinished '@'. In "Advanced Frogguy"
> is <a)>


This is EVA <u>.
I counted at least 6 instances.

Gabriel

References:
- VMs: Re: glyph = combination -- not "compilation" (was: Weirdoes, ligatures)
  - From: Jacques Guy

Prev by Date: VMs: Re: Spa Architecture
Next by Date: VMs: Paradigms Regained
Previous by thread: VMs: Re: glyph = combination -- not "compilation" (was: Weirdoes, ligatures)
Next by thread: VMs: VMS Transcriptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread