Re: VMs: michiton oladabas explained

[Marcin Ciura <ciura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Petr Kazil wrote:

> > 1. Czech of the relevant period was not written with accents:
>
> Talking from memory - it's even worse than lack of accents. Czech of the relevant period was written
> with completely different (and random) spelling. It looked more like Polish. Even for a native
> speaker like me it takes some decipherment to be able to read it.

Excuse me, what do you call the relevant period?
13th century when VMs was presumably written
or 16th century when someone in Prague tried
to decipher it and scribbled on its last page?

Regards,
  Marcin

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list