Nick wrote:
> ... in my experience, most apothecary measures
> in ms recipes of 1450 and before were normally
> in 1s, 2s, 4s, but (especially) 3s (because of
> its magical connotations) - echoes of which
> unsophisticated measures I see reflected in the
> VMS' dain daiin daiiin.
Let's just throw this idea around a bit.
Remember that 'dan' also occurs, but, together
with daiiin it is much less frequent than dain and
daiin. So, which sequence would make more
sense:
0, 1, 2, 3
1, 2, 3, 4
10, 11, 12, 13
11, 12, 13, 14
(more are possible of course).
I kind of like the second, because, perhaps, 'one'
is a word which could be left out as it is implicit,
and 4 would be written more frequently in an
alternative manner (like Roman iiii and iv).
What would the alternative look like in the VMs?