Re: VMs: Re: word length counts

["Jeff" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

With my spinning wheel theory the glyphs could change due to a change of
starting point, therefore mapping each character pair combination to a
different grid in the matrix. The fixing position to restart from could be
signified by those wierdo glyphs.

See my previous messages for more info. BTW this solution would be a ONE WAY
ENCRYPTION. Exactly what you would need for a hoak. As you would be the only
one that knew the solution and could prove it upon being paid. If you were
never paid it is sweet revenge. It could drive people mad trying to solve
it. Ga Ga GA GA ARRRRGGGHHHHH!

:-)


----- Original Message -----
From: "GC" <glenclaston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 09 July 2003 03:30
Subject: RE: VMs: Re: word length counts


>
> Among mutated variants we soon discover that mutants of similar standard
set
> glyphs exhibit similar mutations, which draws one's attention to the
> mutations themselves, to see if they can be classified in sets of "notae"
or
> "notatae".  Right about now I wish I had been writing this reply in PDF,
so
> I could visually demonstrate what I'm pointing to.  Suffice it to say that
> there are signs of a specific stylized notation applied as alteration to
the
> standard set.  This application is systematic, which implies purposeful,
and
> therefore presumably meaningful.
>
> There are many more questions to ask and seek answers to in regard to the
> construction of the VMS glyph set, and only a proper record of all
variants
> can begin to answer these questions.  Even though I still lack a complete
> record of variants, I have enough to support some of my earlier ideas on
VMS
> glyph construction and the purpose served by these mutated variants.
>
> As Nick has commented, "Much like GC, it may well be that I have it
"solved"
> but not "cracked".  With full respect for my trusted colleague and most
> worthy competition, he's got it backward.  I have "cracked" portions, but
I
> certainly don't have the entire cipher "solved".  So much wasted time on
> poor imagery, which leads to lossy transcription, and then there's that
> whole "accepted transcription convention" thing to deal with.  I've always
> thought outside the box, but with the current VMS conventions, every time
I
> break out of a box, I find I've broken free into yet another box.  I
finally
> decided to go back to basics, spend the time it takes to develop a study
> that starts from square one, building no boxes along the way, and once and
> for all determine why every time I encounter a mutant my decipherment
turns
> into toad stool.  It appears I'll be discovering a few more things as this
> progresses.
>
> GC
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list
>

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list