VMs: Re: Re: Constellation of ciphers...

["Jeff" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Francois Almaleh <francois.almaleh@xxxxxxx> WROTE


> We reason with our ideas of the XX century... !
> The Vigenere's code was deciphered late (around the 19th century) and was
> rather strong for most of people during centuries.
> So why the author of VMs would encrypt strongly a text because, for
example,
> Vigenere's code is sufficient ?

 A Vigenere's code linked in a letter pair lookup chain where gallows are
used as offsets would modify the algorithm enough to make it stronger and
less detectable as the goalposts always move. Hovever common word endings
are difficult to maintain easily. So maybe back to the drawing board.

Jeff

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list