[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Babelfish translation [plus question for Dana]
At 10:07 14/11/2003 -0500, Larry Roux wrote:
I disagree. ch is probably 2 glyphs. They are written as 2 distinct
characters and there are examples of ah co and others.
As you know, despite the overwhelmingly dominant regularities observable
within Voynichese, the VMs is studded throughout with handfuls of
character-pairs which "break the rules".
Various people have pointed to evidence which they believe supports the
idea that the VMs' text was copied by one or more scribes who didn't know
what it meant at all. So, there is a not-easily-dismissable possibility
that there are numerous copying errors in the text (one might suggest
letter combinations like "ddy", "dyy" etc?) which might otherwise
destabilise the ciphertext if the system were too fragile.
It could even be that the VMs deliberately uses an over-determined cipher
system (ie, with built in error-detection / error-correction) to compensate
for such scribal errors - that would certainly accord with the kind of
system I predict.
So: I would say that <ch> is *probably* 1 glyph, though of course I agree
that there is limited evidence to suggest that it could *possibly* be 2
glyphs. Or even three. Any advance on three? Ah, the main at the back,
Professor Newbold - what, no bid from you, sir? :-)
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling......
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: