Re: VMs: The gloomy perspective solution guidelines

["Jeff" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nick Pelling incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote
09 December 2003 19:40
Subject: Re: VMs: The gloomy perspective solution guidelines


> Hi Jeff,
>
> At 18:25 09/12/2003 +0000, Jeff wrote:
> >I think if I am on the right track, and also right about other
assumptions,
> >then GC should get the lion's share of the credit. If he hadn't mentioned
> >what he did in one of his last emails I would have passed it by.
>
> Careful - if GC had ever had something like the kind of result you're
> claiming within his grasp, he would have persisted with it right to the
> bitter end. And all because of his love of pizza... :-)
>
> While absence of evidence is not normally evidence of absence, I feel sure
> he would have mentioned something along the way if he had been that close.
:-)
>
> Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....
>

Maybe he wants to be the one who gets the credit for breaking it. In that
case why would he feel the need to share?

Jeff


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list