Re: VMs: The gloomy perspective solution guidlines

[Bruce Grant <bgrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

IMHO, this would be a mistake to demand such a relationship, because 
there is no reason to believe that such a relationship is really there.

You could say it is implausible that someone would put an unrelated 
picture on a page of text, but those of you who are computer types 
probably have an example close at hand: the famous O'Reilly handbooks. 
What do camels and lizards have to do with computer languages?

I don't think you can dictate what the VMS will mean, but you can demand 
that it be encrypted (or whatever) in a consistent way. Of course, a 
devious encryptor could use a different system on every page, but if he 
did, it's essentially hopeless anyway.

Bruce


matt welnicki wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> I feel your pain.  Just when you start to see patterns
> and can sense order you wind up farther back than where
> you started.  I do agree, however, with your assessment
> about Strong and GC, and your reference to Strong's
> letter about Dee was interesting.
>
> All,
>
> With respect to the solution guidlines:  should we make
> it a requirement that any solution for a page or
> paragraphs reasonably relate to any drawings on the
> page.  I would imagine that some leeway could exist for
> marginal "doodles" or sketches, but I would think there
> needs to be some connection with the more identifiable
> pictures such as zodiac signs and plants.  
>
> Matt
>  
>
> _________________________________________________
> FindLaw - Free Case Law, Jobs, Library, Community
> http://www.FindLaw.com
> Get your FREE @JUSTICE.COM email!
> http://mail.Justice.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list
>  


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list