[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Re: NSU review of Rugg (2003)...
Thanks - yes, this is what I meant.
> Gabriel -- Occam's Razor as applied by Gordon doesn't prove anything, it's just
> a rule of thumb.
> You are right is as far as it's impossible to _prove_ that any coded text is
> gibberish. But Gordon wrote about the "economical explanation"; I think he
> meant something along the lines of "common sense would suggest, if it quacks
> like a duck, walks like a duck, and looks like a duck..."
> P.S.: Sorry for the duplicate of my previous post.
> Zitat von Gabriel Landini <G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Friday 19 December 2003 08:52, Gordon Rugg wrote:
> > >...
> > > I'm saying that _if_ all the features of the VMS can be accounted for by
> > > possibility 1 above, then that's the most economical explanation.
> > I am still not to convinced with this. I think option 1 is undecidable
> > ...
> > Cheers,
> > Gabriel
> debitel.net Webmail
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: