I haven't been paying enough attention - what definition are you guys
using for the term "glyph"? Thanks, Bruce Larry Roux wrote: <sigh> iin is NOT "certainly one glyph". I believe there are occurrences where "ii" is one glyph, some where iin is a glyph and some where it is i "in" (akin to iw) Let me *randomly* select a few pages (I could find strikingly better examples if I cared to argue this further. f47v - daiidy (ii is a "u" here), saiin (what I see as saud) f86 (Onion tower section) daiin is clearly da"ii" n (ii is one character, not iin here) I could find dozens of very clear examples where iin is NOT a single glyph, but I am tired of the whole argument. ps: f66 - List of single glyphs shows "c from ch" as a single character. ****************************** Larry Roux Syracuse University lroux@xxxxxxx *******************************tsalagi@xxxxxxxx 12/18/03 11:55PM >>>Jacques Guy wrote:5950 times out of 5984 <in> is preceded by <a> or <i> Isn't that interesting?<iin> is almost certainly one glyph, and also <in> . That <ain> is so frequent and other groupings so infrequent is rather more interesting, though no surprise. Dennis ______________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: unsubscribe vms-list ______________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: unsubscribe vms-list |