[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
VMs: left & right word entropy
Hi everybody,
Reading back Akinori Ito's very interesting paper on left & right word
entropies (sorry I can't give a link as I re-discovered a pdf copy floating
in my hard drive) kept me thinking about the "directionality" of the vms
text.
I understand that his findings may be interpreted to point to a lack of
grammar.
I just can't imagine a natural language in which the words do not have some
determined order in the text flow (Jacques?).
This takes me to think why this could happen, and again to think about the
possibility of lossy encodings.
Let's suppose that initial-<y> codes for different things, as in Cappelli's
abbreviations for com-, con-, cum-.
If this was the case we end up with a collection of different words that are
written as one. If there was any favoured directionality in the flow of the
text, then I think that any direction bias would disappear and thus vms-words
would appear to be balanced between their left and right entropy.
Same thing with the plume <'>. If this is a "missing letter/s" abbreviation
(again following Cappelli) probably vms-words with plumes may be different
words even if they look the same.
Same thing with the <i> strokes as mentioned a few messages ago.
Any comments?
Cheers,
Gabriel
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list