Re: VMs: In the news again...

[Gabriel Landini <G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1130727,00.html
> The printed page has a couple of not-very-good reproductions of bits and
> pieces.

The article reads:

'Rugg's conclusion is that Voynichese - the language of the Voynich manuscript 
- is utter gibberish, put together as random assemblies of different 
syllables. 
[...]
In fact, it was created by Kelley as a deception to make him money. He  
succeeded. The Voynich manuscript was the Elizabethan equivalent of the 
Hitler diaries.' 


Is that's a fact then? or is it just a bad interpretation of the paper in 
Cryptologia?
Cheers,

Gabriel


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list