Re: VMs: Dated At Last?

["Larry Roux" <lroux@xxxxxxx>]

<grin>

But it is also important to note that sometimes the "experts" (linear-b anyone?) know too much for their own good.  Of course there are far more examples for traditional thought, but every now and then an outsider sees something that those entrenched in the project just look past.

This is why all the newcomers are so welcome!  

Every time I am convinced that this thing is bogus and we'll never know what it is someone comes up with some new bit of information.  To paraphrase...every time I am ready to quit you guys (and gals) keep pulling me back.




******************************
Larry Roux
Syracuse University
lroux@xxxxxxx
*******************************
>>> bgrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 01/26/04 21:25 PM >>>
This is very reassuring: since it is becoming clear that deciphering the 
VM is not one of the many things which "doesn't take a rocket 
scientist", it's good to have one on hand.

Bruce

Dennis wrote:

>	Remember, all, that Rene is a space scientist, and 
>that therefore his opinion has special weight.
>  
>


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list