Re: VMs: The Glyphset

[steve ekwall <ekwall2@xxxxxxxx>]

*Yes* 

it was dennis, sorry to both about that!

best to you & yours
-=se=-
steve (i'll be more careful - THX) ekwall 

 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:14:57 -0600
 From: Knox Mix <knoxmix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Reply-To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: VMs: The Glyphset
 
 Ref:	From:	steve ekwall <ekwall2@xxxxxxxx>
 	To:	vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx 
 	Subject:	Re: VMs: The Glyphset - (ES)TIME.LINE
 	Date sent:	Mon, 2 Feb 2004 00:19:06 -1000 (HST)
 >It wasn't until knox wrote 10-1100 for age of the vms [snip]
 
 Hello Steve, 
 
 I did not attribute an age or date to the manuscript. 
 Maybe you got the idea from this:
 
 Dennis wrote [in part]:
 >> The gallows embellishments are mainly seen in the 10-1100's.  
 >>However, I still think most of the evidence points to a later time.
 
 Best Regards,
 
 Knox
 

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list