Re: VMs: The Key -- [case against "qo"]

["Jeff" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eventually Nick you will verbose yourself out of all information content.
Reductions produce more likely verbose candidates. Do those also represent
verbose combos?

Jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Pelling" <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 15 February 2004 10:18
Subject: Re: VMs: The Key -- [case against "qo"]


> Hi Knox,
>
> At 20:54 14/02/2004 -0600, Knox wrote:
> >This is what sways me:
> >"q" before likely composites "or" and "ol"
> >  22  "qor"
> >134  "qol"
>
> Now here's what sways me: qol typically appears on pages where
> free-standing l characters (ie, ones not part of "ol" pairs) appear. My
> conclusion: that qo is indeed a verbose pair of some sort.
>
> >I might later challenge "dy" as a composite. One approach might be to
> >find which method leaves the least number of singletons and which has
> >fewer exceptions to its rule.
>
> Feel free to try - but dy does appear everywhere.
>
> Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list