[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: dating the VMs



At 11:01 22/02/2004 -0800, Manfred Staudinger wrote:
Normally you don't write on vellum from scratch but instead you use a piece of
paper and make a copy of it on vellum. When we talk about dating the VMs then
we mean only this process of copying! The paper which was used might be older,
how much we cannot know.

I would extend this is two directions (probably obvious but anyway useful note: I am trying to see things from the perspective of a late-medieval / early modern scribe; so "you" is not "someone among us, 21th c. readers/writers" but an ancient scribe).


1) Normally you don't write a *book* from scratch. Either you copy it from an exemplar (if it is somebody else's work) or you assemble it from notes, minutes, etc.

2) The source you are copying/assembling from can be older: "you" may be a XVI c. scribe copying a Cicero's oration...

The leaves show plenty of space but I cannot remember a single vellum ms. from
say before 1500 which was not written tightly (because of the costly material). On
those old mss. you can see thin lines for carefully planing the space available
for
the later writing. By the way, I would guess such a format-free writing on vellum
does not occur before the second half of the 16th century ie after 1550. Any
other opinions?

Space around the writing area is difficult to estimate: most codices have been trimmed and re-trimmed. Space *inside* the writing area (i.e. how much the writing itself is tight or loose) greatly depends upon the writing 'style' and/or technique (I have a peculiar dislike for the concept of "writing style", whence the quotes). As Nick Pelling just pointed out, there are writings (mainly in the early-medieval and _antiqua_ traditions) which exhibit a looseness (or, better, non-tightness) comparable with the Vms writing. In general, these considerations are to a considerable extent subjective and then rarely decisive, even if often worth noting.


The absence of ruling surprised me. I have to confess that I cannot correlate this with a date (mainly because of my ignorance); I would have assumed that vellum ruling was the norm (with possible, rare, exceptions).

Compared with the relative crudeness of the drawings, this might indicate the Vms is not a *final* product, but an intermediate step of a longer process (not necessarily actually carried to its end).

Maurizio


Maurizio M. Gavioli - VistaMare Software via San Bernardo 5, I-16030 Pieve Ligure, ITALY http://www.vistamaresoft.com/

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list