Re: VMs: Re: The latest on Kennedy & Churchill's book...

[Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi everyone,

At 23:56 26/02/2004 -0800, Rene Zandbergen wrote:
> --- Jeff <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Nick Pelling incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote
> > > For example, one woman was convinced it was
> > > mirrored High German (it isn't),
> > And that's a fact huh? Oh you are so authoritative
> > Nick!
> I'm pretty sure Nick's point can be maintained.
> Even if the MS were in High German, it would have
> to have gone through such an amount of 'encryption'
> that it could just as well have been French, Finnish
> or Faetar. I'm sure that this was not the point
> of the lady's theory. The 'mirrored' is also a
> dead giveaway.

Thanks - my point exactly. :-)

> > > and another man was equally convinced from his
> > > research at the British
> > > Library that it was a Kelly hoax (it wasn't):
> > With such an intellect a solution must be imminent.
> > You have it all taped.
>
> I'm with Jeff here (well, at least with his
> objection :-) ). We're not yet in a position
> to prove that it wasn't Kelly. Perhaps this man's
> particular theory can be disproven, though.

Thanks - my point exactly. :-)

I'm quite sure I've looked at the same Kelly mss at the British Library as 
this man would have done, and while I concluded that they (especially the 
number squares in the "Liber mysteriorum sextus et sanctus...") are 
supportive of the idea that Kelly did the foliation, AFAICT they're not 
supportive of the hoax theory - you'd need an entirely different kind of 
evidence to prove that.

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling..... 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list