[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Initial gallows
hi knox :-)
in a folded key decoding, a word like "and" would just be 2 seperate
"words" ... that is: "dar" or "xyz" for example.. the "a" and the "n"
and the "d" are _static_. the only reason for "xyz" equaling "dar" for
"and" is its _mirror_ image.
no need to change, unless you want to? (scribes whim?) by adding a
gallows character. that's the ~crumbling effect~ of this code come
into effect (x8), e.g.
say:
"AND" = equals only "dar" OR "xyz"
but if 3 letter word? (scribe)
gallows# inserted (becomes)
"AND" = equals only "G(3)xj" or "G(8)ra"
The above system (luckily?) is then actually cut in half for easier
decypherment.
-=se=-
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:02:51 -0600
From: knoxmix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: VMs: Initial gallows
Hello Larry and Nick
Line initial gallows could represent an introductory phrase. I think
that is not too likely since internal gallows are positioned between
letters that often are sequential pairs elsewhere (count is needed
here). For that reason I do not think they change a key, at least not
beginning with the next letter.
Ciao ........... Knox
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 at 18:57:35 -0500
Larry Roux wrote:
What I am finding as a problem related to a code change system is the
preponderance of common words (dar) that seem to equate to an "and".
if the code basis changed (cypher, table, or whatever) you would
think these words would change too. But then I have not investigated
whether those words are common to certain paragraph prefaces (t, k,
p, f).
So I argue against my own theories. I can do that, can't I? <grin>
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list