Re: VMs: Smithsonian Botanical Symposium, 6th-8th May 2004

[Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- William Edmondson <w.h.edmondson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> But also of note is that the VMs conatins nothing
> which looks like a rose, or does it?

It depends how much fantasy one has :-)
Keeping in mind what has been said about the
accuracy of ME botanical drawings (I think I read
it in Toresella's article), where elements that
belong to a flower are occasionally drawn as
tubers or v.v. (plants have even been drawn upside
down), then, with the right amount of fantasy,
f22v could be a rose.

http://www.voynichinfo.com/microfilm/f22v.jpg

I am sure this can be challenged :-)

Cheers, Rene


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢
http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list