[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Manchu theory
At 23:22 11/05/2004 -0300, Jorge Stolfi wrote:
Nick Pelling says that the "Manchu theory" does not fit the historical
record. Please note that all the historical dates in question refer to
the Manchu *script*, not the Manchu *language*, which probably existed
(modulo natural evolution) for over 1000 years -- as "Manchu",
"Jurchen", or any other name.
I agree - but the claimed solution appears to be based on finding 50 words
of Manchu language out of 200+ pages of (vaguely) Manchu-like script. But
(unless I'm mistaken) this seems close to saying that within the EVA
transcription, you can find numerous modern English words - far, shy, or,
char (and so on).
The "Manchu theory" is that some European visited the region sometime
before the 15th century, invented a brand new alphabetic script for
the local spoken language, and used that script to transcribe some
texts dictated by local people -- scholars, astrologers, doctors,
herbalists, whatever. (Other variants of this scenario are possible,
I'm really not dissing the [15th century] Chinese theory here. :-) Rather,
I'm just saying that a 4th century BCE date seems about two millennia out,
which is really more than I can comfortably swallow without some
exceptionally persuasive evidence. :-o
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: