Re: VMs: Re: Transcription Ramble

["Larry Roux" <lroux@xxxxxxx>]

The problem is that I am convinced that iin can be seen as written three ways:

iin
un
iw

and I believe I see occurrences of all three in the Voy

I'll have examples of all of these shortly


Larry Roux
Syracuse University
lroux@xxxxxxx

>>> bgrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/26/04 20:52 PM >>>
Gabriel Landini wrote:

>But <i> and <n> need to be separate characters because they also occur on 
>their own. So let's suppose that <iin> is now called M. How do you write 
><okan>? The inconsistency therefore becomes that the <n> in <iin> looks the 
>same as the last character in <okan> yet they are coded differently, thus 
>contradicting the principle 'show exactly what it looks like'.
>
I imagine that the reason the Currier transcription uses different 
symbols for <in>, <iin>, and <iiin> was that most letters other than 
"i"  do not repeat two or three times. Perhaps a more appropriate 
approach which is consistent with Gabriel's point would be to have 
symbols for <i>, <ii>, and <iii> and to transcribe <iiin> as <iii><n>  
and so on.

Bruce



______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list