Re: VMs: Search for missing folios, quires et al.

[Gabriel Landini <G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Saturday 26 June 2004 23:51, Jim Gillogly wrote:
> I think it's almost certain that at least six of the missing fourteen
> leaves are somewhere in private hands, because those six went missing
> in the 20th century, between the time Newbold studied it and the time
> Kraus wrote his catalogue description.
> -- 

Interesting!

I guess that this then can be narrowed down to between the time Newbod studied 
the ms (his 'solution' was publicised on the 20 Apr. 1921) and 1931 (before 
Ms. V visited Hyvernat), because the Peterson copy (as far as I am aware) 
does not have a transcription of the missing folios. The same can be said 
about the photostat copy that Friedman got in 1944.

Cheers

Gabriel
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list