[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: VMS provenance
======= you wrote: =======
>I now have enough circumstantial evidence to say one of two things.
>1. Gordon Rugg is right in EVERY respect or
>2. The VMS is an important historical document.
While points 1. and 2. appear to be mutually exclusive, the work on them is not and the proof of the one (that is the finding the solution!) would actually eliminate the other one. We may find out that the both attempts will reach the same target, that is the SOLUTION and only at the end we can tell, if the result is 1. or 2.
Let's define what we actually mean by a hoax: the encoded gibberish or meaningful, but not too
interesting text - or even the copy of valuable text - pretending to be quite old? The crucial question
is: if the author created a hoax, what would he choose as his plaintext: gibberish or sensible text? While
the first is impossible to crack - you never know when you cracked it :-) - the other is easier to encode
(you just pick some book and fire away, being able in any time to spot the mistakes). On the other
hand, if you encode the gibberish and make a mistake, it does not matter :-). Still, I would guess the
author used some of his own text or research - for the sake of Mr. Rugg himself. I do consider
Mr. Rugg's efforts rather interesting, however he would never be able to prove the plaintext was only a
gibberish since one gets it with any method of decoding, except one :-). If however he finds the meaningful, however unimportant text underneath, I would be content he proved his point.
So I believe his work on cracking - in substance - shouldn't be too different from ours and he should
eventually reach the same end - the true solution. And whatever the solution is, it would not make the
VM less important. So author fooled Rudolph or somebody else ( beats mne why we considere
gullible only Rudolph?) ; that is n ot the popint. The ingenuity he put it all together, keeping so many
people working on that mystery for so long, all that is enough for me to tip my hat in admiration. I
would even call it as important as any other artifact :-).
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: