[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: Re: Moot points, getting long

To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VMs: Re: Moot points, getting long
From: Gabriel Landini <G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 13:00:34 +0100
In-reply-to: <200408081253.08037.G.Landini@bham.ac.uk>
Organization: The University of Birmingham, UK.
References: <20040804183815.77903.qmail@web40402.mail.yahoo.com> <000d01c47d2c$78678620$5e2f1341@default> <200408081253.08037.G.Landini@bham.ac.uk>
Reply-to: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

On Sunday 08 August 2004 12:53, Gabriel Landini wrote:
> However one could save a lot of time: looking for <sh> and correcting only
> those (4543 instances) is about six time less work than reading the entire
> ms (which is 233500 or so characters).

Sorry, I meant "sixty", not six. It is actually 51 times less... 
About 51 times more reasons :-)

Cheers,

Gabriel
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list

References:
- Re: VMs: Re: Moot points, getting long
  - From: Rene Zandbergen
- Re: VMs: Re: Moot points, getting long
  - From: GC
- Re: VMs: Re: Moot points, getting long
  - From: Gabriel Landini

Prev by Date: Re: VMs: Re: Moot points, getting long
Next by Date: Re: VMs: Arguments against a code book?
Previous by thread: Re: VMs: Re: Moot points, getting long
Next by thread: Re: VMs: Re: Moot points, getting long
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread