Re: VMs: Re: Re: Inks and retouching

[Nick Pelling <nickpelling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Erni,

At 14:26 09/08/2004 -0400, Erni Lillie wrote:
> If it can be shown that someone went to the trouble to homogenize what may
> have originally included male figures into all female by adding breasts
> and big hair, then I think this points to something that they felt was
> important to hide.

I'm not really comfortable with this, particularly because some of the 
zodiac "nymphs" are noticeably male. :-o

Really, I suspect that there's a lot more that would need to be worked out 
about the physical construction of this set of pages before we can get a 
reasonable idea of whether something important is being hidden there or not.

> If there's one thing I've learned studying the manuscript, its:
> Why use 1 layer of code, when 3 will do so much better?

Sadly, this also often seems true of VMs explanations - why invoke one 
dubious genie (say, Edward Kelley) when you can invoke three or more? :-o

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling..... 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list