Re: VMs: A cryptological assault on Strong's decryption...

[Elmar Vogt <elvogt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rene Zandbergen wrote:
> ...
> Hi Nick,
>
> I propose that we go down to the basics:
>
> ...
> So why should anyone want to disprove the Strong
> solution in particular? There's no need. It
> is not any more credible than the other ones
> listed above. The burden is on the one who wishes
> to have us believe in it.
>
> Cheers, Rene

Rene-

I for my own part just want to _understand_ what Strong was all about before 
dismissing his ideas. Although my _opinion_ currently is, "this is all very 
much messed up", I can't really form a _conviction_ without knowing his 
suggested algorithm, so I'm very grateful for Nick's attempts to give us a 
clearer picture.

	Elmar

--
Elmar Vogt / Königswarterstr. 18 / 90762 Fürth / GERMANY
elvogt@xxxxxxxxxxx / Tel.: (++49/0)911 - 31 52 58
Agilmar v. Sevelingen: AGE PERDITUS, FAC ME DIES (Haroldus Sordidus)

"It is through the truthful exercising of the best of human qualities -
respect for others, honesty about ourselves, faith in our ideals - that
we come to life in God's eyes." (Bruce Springsteen, "Vote for Change")

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list