Re: VMs: Long-range correlations

[Bruce Grant <bgrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dennis S. wrote:

> I've been thinking that this is the strongest argument against Rugg.  A hoaxer would probably have needed an implausibly large number of  tables and grilles.
I admit that I haven't been following Rugg's argument too closely, but 
rather than using tables and grilles, could the same algorithm have been 
used, say, with decks of cards (maybe three decks, of beginnings, 
middles and ends)?

It would be easy to use lots of cards, and a lot easier to shuffle a 
deck than to create new grilles or tables. Or am I missing something 
(probably)?

Bruce





______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list