[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: VMs: provable?

To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: VMs: provable?
From: Koontz John E <John.Koontz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:09:54 -0600 (MDT)
In-reply-to: <JAEKJOMCOCMKCPMKKHGMKEOBCKAA.markefincher@travelinfosystems.com>
References: <JAEKJOMCOCMKCPMKKHGMKEOBCKAA.markefincher@travelinfosystems.com>
Reply-to: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Marke Fincher wrote:
> In a sample of the King James I've got which is about the same
> size there are 18400 words in the vocabulary of which 6500
> occur only once (35%).  The VMs is about 69%.

I wonder if statistics would be different for a language with more
inflection tha KJE?  What would happen with the Vulgate text or a French
text?

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list

References:
- RE: VMs: provable?
  - From: Marke Fincher

Prev by Date: Re: VMs: Grove words (was: A very important discovery)
Next by Date: Re: VMs: Jung and Modern/Traditional Astrology?
Previous by thread: RE: VMs: provable?
Next by thread: RE: VMs: provable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread