[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: Forged to look old in 1634

To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VMs: Forged to look old in 1634
From: Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=eypo2pCqx1ebgG+V+ooKFIMcWi9EuvREfCzE9XpElTz8jq0lTTIBUPs+8cwtuuIsh1q6yzGlcDsaPMZks2gjrv06qDSPl7pR9tpC7L+hMlmxMC0TqpF56WUbOR1dFR+X183zhkCUq8QEnRtHmcww99j3q6UV82lMmDjVF/wSE4w= ;
In-reply-to: <BAY101-F25B5A0D521D8210361EC47FA6B0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx

--- Philip Neal <philipneal_vms@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There is a fascinating article in the current issue
> of the New York Review 
> of Books about a corpus of forged Etruscan
> manuscripts produced around 1636.

Quite interesting!

I may be dense but: these forged Etruscan
manuscripts, do they really exist, or is this
all part of a novel. 

Cheers, Rene

__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page ? Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com 
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: VMs: Forged to look old in 1634
  - From: Philip Neal

References:
- VMs: Forged to look old in 1634
  - From: Philip Neal

Prev by Date: VMs: pox leber/f116v
Next by Date: Re: VMs: Forged to look old in 1634
Previous by thread: VMs: pox leber/f116v
Next by thread: Re: VMs: Forged to look old in 1634
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread