VMs: Re: VMS underlying language

[Jacques Guy <jguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

25/02/2005 4:47:38 PM, mesinik@xxxxxx wrote:

>Quoting Jacques Guy <jguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> 25/02/2005 2:26:58 PM, mesinik@xxxxxx wrote:
>> >But could you be a little bit more specific? Have you tested it with some
>> >of the Tataric dialects? Any opinions about mixed Tataric/Mongolian/maybe
>> > more? 

>> Can't be, unless it is a very strange cipher.

>I just asked for a link ... maybe I agree, if the maths are staying in touch
>with real world ... could you please give this link, if you have it?

I don't have one


>if I should choose now, I would take Tibetan.

But it cannot be Tibetan spelt like it has been for centuries.
It might just, just be Tibetan spelt "phonetically", but then
which dialect and when? 

If I was not so adverse to wasting my time I would try cracking the
VMs on the assumption that the letters <a>, <e>, and <o> are vowels
with approximately those values, that <iin> nasalizes the previous
vowel, and so on. The chances are that I would get nowhere in the
end. So I won't even try. However, if the VMs is ever deciphered,
I won't be surprised if <a> turns out to be "a", and <aiin> to be
"ã"

 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list