[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: Re: VMs: NEW SCIENTIST 11/2001 ZANDONELLA
- To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: OT: Re: VMs: NEW SCIENTIST 11/2001 ZANDONELLA
- From: Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=JxlHeIwONzPowKP/6C4Ooxef12MXp5OlNbzF6pxcLD9oCorFusMcjLxqth6PUcQRa2x1ftuVlpoy4icigRjImx3TFooIF7UeLsk9r2sirFGpX7yZxhmJJ9ZJignVeFiQ8NxocNLb8ZR9qAvGgXQ/6zMjVJ87CnD6ImO0boMudls= ;
- In-reply-to: 6667
- Reply-to: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
--- "Rafal T. Prinke" <rafalp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I remember a sentence from my book of English
> grammar excercises:
>
> If a sentence that had "had had" had had "had",
> it would have been correct.
Was the sentence referring to itself?
:-)
Rene
PS: no need for anyone to show that the number of
'had' can be increased ad infinitum by recursion
of the above sentence.
It's somwhere in the archive :-)
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list