[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: MS408 Character Development
Many thanks for the interesting reply.
On Monday 04 July 2005 12:31, Maurizio M. Gavioli wrote:
> On one hand, we may safely assume that the VM script author was familiar
> with the Latin abbreviation system (as he was familiar with the _littera
> moderna_ stroke assimilation system).
> On the other hand, many of those abbreviation-like signs, like for instance
> EVA 'g' or EVA 'm' (but also 'r', 's' or 'u'), are very obvious 'pen turns'
> which may come quite spontaneously to anybody with the penmanship of a late
> Middle Age scholar. This might mean that those signs do not have the same
> meaning (or at least a similar function) they had in the 'normal writing',
> but that they are simply common, or well-practiced, graphic material
> borrowed into the script, like many 'full characters' of the script.
I keep thinking that there is that there is too low entropy for an abbreviated
script in which each word is a character or an abbreviation (let alone a
"word" per character!).
At some time I liked the idea that the vms was perhaps not complicatedly
encoded and (at least some 'characters') could be position-dependent
abbreviations (y-initial not the same as y-final, so the low entropy could
not be as low as thought), but of course nothing can be read yet.
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: