[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: fake letters
At 12:01 13/07/2005 -0500, Knox Mix wrote:
<qol> for a demo was not the best choice but to race a slow horse we do
not know a letter (<l> for example) is free-standing in all positions or
in any position adjacent another letter or across a space from another letter.
Actually, I picked my <qol> horse quite carefully. If you look at Herbal A
pages, you only typically see <l> in <ol> pairs and <q> in <qo> pairs
(IIRC) - but in the balneological section, whereas <q> is still in <qo>
pairs, <l> occurs elsewhere too. What I find persuasive is that the
overwhelming majority of <qol> instances occur on pages where <l> occurs
several times elsewhere *not in <ol> pairs*.
It should be a good exercise to examine the (particularly simple)
statistics behind this claim - I drew my conclusion (that where <qol>
occurs, it's <qo> + <l>, and so not a contraction of <qo> + <ol>) a long
time ago, hopefully this explanation should make it clear why I believe it
to be so.
>ie, that <cho> can never be followed by <ol> in the underlying language.
We have not read all the possible literature but it would seem so if there
is an underlying language.
Really, I'm using the word "language" in a loose sense here: rather, that
the micro-structure of the order of the underlying text seems consistent
with a yet-to-be determined rule-based grammar of sorts, whether further
enciphered or not. Essentially, there seems to be structure beneath the
(fake alphabet) surface...
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: