[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Astrological symbols... decoded!
At 23:33 03/10/01 +0000, Jacques Guy wrote:
Nick Pelling wrote:
> Decoding the
> (2nd ring in) sequence of 17 x 4 is so obvious it's *shocking*.
The only obvious thing to me is that the zodiac does
not start with Aries,
Hmmm... neither does the VMS astrological section. :-)
and has only ten signs instead of
Planets aside, I can count 12 different signs within the line (10 + 2): and
the two existing signs which you can easily write in a single penstroke
(Capricorn and Leo) are almost entirely unchanged & in the correct position
relative to each other. The correspondences with Aries and Aquarius are
pretty good too: and I can make a pretty good case for all the planets and
almost all the other signs. :-)
Take aim... FIRE! :-)
Cheers, ....Nick Pelling....