RE: Cipher vs Language

[steve ekwall <ekwall2@xxxxxxxx>]

hi all (WOW, talking about walking on  egg-shells here:-)

 > person(s) --- say over a pizza and beer.
 
stolfi
 > Not so: the language camp now has good
 > evidence that the physical
 > words (space-delimited strings) are
 > indeed linguistic words (units of
 > meaning), and that their internal
 > structure is syllable-like.
GC 
 The same thing can be accomplished with an
 algorithmically generated table, never leaving
 western language structure and without introducing
 an exotic language into the equation.  Once I can
 come up with a transcription alphabet suitable to
 everyone that doesn't include a slew of
 unnecessary characters, I'll be presenting this
 possibility in detail.

-=se=-> in TOTAL agreement, the vms is BOTH coded and a Language, 
    neither can stand alone , as the 'tildE~' after TouchE~ 
    *YES* the Folding KEY supply's and/or assumes linguistically
    spaced word lengths, spaces are not nulls but true spaces! 
    EEach pointing to a character / Ccharacter is indeed coded.. 

as if the WORD "THE" was folded XYZ (it could be) 

XYZ 
TYZ
THZ

XHZ
XHE
THE 

6 ways - PLUS IF (m)irrored give GC's 12? table etc..
 
(m)X(m)Y(m)Z
(m)T(m)Y(m)Z
(m)T(m)H(m)Z

(m)X(m)H(m)Z
(m)X(m)H(m)E
(m)T(m)H(m)E 


note, this is NOT a mathmatical exponential of possiblilties, IT is a
simple 1/2 FOLDING or MIRRORing that produces 12 possibilities. So,
computer algorithm's might fall short?  It would take a true Linguist
to spot the OUTPUT Flow to even catch it! else start at beginning..

But TWICE the CODE shifting as in 

THE
HET
EHT    etc...


we need ALL inputs! IF the MIRROR is not mirrored then we have normal
length alpabets * numbers and the linguist will shine in helping 
here!!

SIMPLY the Best to all 
-=se=-
steve (chinese pizza?) ekwall