Re: VMs: Star Magnitudes within Manuscript

[steve ekwall <ekwall2@xxxxxxxx>]

YES* Factual 

Coded! But will need OLD (study) Linguists to READ IT !
No Garbage, NO ~"noise~~, NOISE is NOT VMS , This is new to us!

-=se=-
steve (ShhHhhhHhh) ekwall
ps. the TIME is NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!

 


 Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:15:47 -0800 (PST)
 From: Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>
 Reply-To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: Re: VMs: Star Magnitudes within Manuscript
 
 --- Adam Sparshott <adam.sparshott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:
 
 > I agree that the number of points on a star would be
 > the best
 > way of showing its magnitude.
 
 It is my feeling exactly.
 I am pretty sure that there must be quite a few
 postings in the mailing list archives that address
 this in some detail.
 To be more specific: I am totally sure that in
 the zodiac section the number of points per
 star show the magnitude. This fits with the
 assumption that the crowned nymphs represent
 Regulus.
 
 Yet even more specifically, this means (to me)
 that the VMs does not contain garbage or noise,
 but (f)actual information.
 
 Cheers,
         Rene
 
 __________________________________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
 http://mailplus.yahoo.com
 ______________________________________________________________________
 To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
 unsubscribe vms-list
 
 

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list