Re: VMs: Word Dependency -> ARABIC??

[vladimir@xxxxxxxx]

It is not "sentences" but word pairs.

Yes, is the left side column the "previous word" and   the top row the "next 
word".
The table 2 means two following words, like "keedy om", the first word starts 
with gallow, the second ends with m or g.
It is not sentencs. 
107 means - normal distribution, a little more as expected cases.

Regards

> On Monday 17 Mar 2003 11:39 pm, Vladimir Sazonov wrote:
> > Here I tried to investigate dependency between previous word and the
> > next word, depending on initials and finals.
> > http://voynich.naobum.de/syntax1.htm
> > 1. The most spectacular is the Table 4, displaying very strong
> > dependency between the final of the previous word and the initial of the
> > next word.
> 
> Vladimir,
> I am confused with the table. Is the left side column the "previous word" 
and 
> the top row the "next word"?
> 
> I am surprised that table 2 has not so strong dependency (107) of K M 
> (sentences starting with a gallow and ending with m or g). 
> Am I reading the table correctly?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gabriel
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list