Re: VMs: Word Dependency -> ARABIC??

[Vladimir Sazonov <vladimir@xxxxxxxx>]

Gabriel Landini wrote:

> This seems all OK to me, but the problem is that the gallow letters at the 
> <BOP> words may be just a decoration. So I propose to have a look at the 
> distribution of <BOP> words and see if they remain valid vms words after 
> removing the gallow. Would that make sense?
Yeah, now I have as the first words about 6,5 average frequency,
if I simply remove gallows, I have the average frequency 100 (15 times more)
It is because I meet ol, or, chedy, shedy, aiin, chol, chey. ar and most 
of high-frequent words,
BUT NOT: daiin,  shey, okain, dal,s, dy,  dain and q-words.

But it does not prove that gallows are decorative, because if I take ALL 
the gallows in  the whole text, I see
that they are LESS frequent (average frequency about 2,5) .

All my best
Vladimir


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list