Re: AW: VMs: Yet More stuff (nonsense) on Rhewll

[Dennis <tsalagi@xxxxxxxx>]

Nick Pelling wrote:
> 
> 
> Perhaps the creator of the VMS was the first "big pharma"? Distrustful of
> letters patent (which are only short-lived, and dependent on continued
> patronage), it decided to place its intellectual property under
> cryptographic lock and key... before its code-maker unfortunately died of
> the plague (the licence on his bezoar stone must have run out), leaving the
> VMS. :-o  

	I like it!  

> It may be rubbish, but it makes more sense than pointing a finger at the
> Cathars. :-)

	<shudder> On the remote chance that anyone takes
Levitov seriously, here's 
Jacques' critique, based on linguistic science:

http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~stolfi/voynich/mirror/reeds/gillogly/levitov

and mine, based on historical evidence on Catharism:

http://www.geocities.com/ctesibos/voynich/levitov2.htm

	Quite enough evidence in either case, I think!

Dennis
--------------------------------
[This E-mail scanned for viruses]

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list