----- Original Message -----
Sent: 13 February 2004 09:50
Subject: VMs: RE: Re: RE: RE: Evita, EVA,
and transcriptions.
John,
In
which character set/transcription method are you working? I generally use EVA
- but regardless of that, the point I was trying to draw attention to was the
apparent 'feature' halfway down many of the gallows characters. Numbers 6
and 7 (below) look like they used to have an 'e' or 'i' character as the
right-hand leg, which was then overwritten. All the examples below look (to
me) as though the feet were drawn in a different operation from the top
half.
My
question was whether this might simply have been the easiest way to draw these
characters when using a quill, or whether we ought to consider reading more
into the way these characters are formed.
Jon.
-----Original
Message-----
From: john stojko
[mailto:oko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 February 2004
18:17
To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: VMs: Re: RE: RE:
Evita, EVA, and transcriptions.
Importance: Low
Gallows are defined.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 12
I numbered the alphabets (gallows) from
1-12.
The letters (gallows) have the following
meanings;
No. 1, 4, 6, 7, 10, and 12 are letter " T
"
No. 2, 3, 8, 9 are two letters combined, " ST "
or " SH T "
No. 11 is 3-letters combined, " PST " or " PSHT
"
In VMs alphabet there are two letters for S or
SH
The VMs letter that look like number 4 is
always used at the
beginning of word or sentence. Observe the
combination
of ST or SHT in N0. 2, 3, 8
and 9.
Also observe difference in hand
writings.
John
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004
12:33 PM
Subject: VMs: RE: RE: Evita, EVA, and
transcriptions.
I've put the image at:
Jon.
Hi Barbara,
In your detailed examination of the script, have you
noticed that frequently the 'legs' of the gallows characters appear to
have been drawn in halves? It's as though one or two short strokes were
drawn for the foot/feet, and then the top half added in a separate
movement. Sometimes there is a small gap in the middle of a leg,
sometimes a kink, sometimes a slight overlap. In some cases the second
'foot' of a /t/ or /k/ looks like it started out as an /e/. Of course I
don't know what it means, but it struck me as a strange way to have
written these characters. Maybe using a quill forces one to use a
writing style which seems illogical to someone who's never tried it -
what do you think?
I have a jpg of various examples, if anyone's
interested.
Jon.