Re: VMs: Re: "Running code" -- I hope not...

["Jeff" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What about a running code amalgamated with Jon Grove's VMS generator. Now
that might fly!

Jeff

From: <elvogt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 23 February 2004 07:57


> Zitat von DANA SCOTT <dscott520@xxxxxxx>:
>
> > Those of us who are not cryptologists probably rely on this type of
anlysis
> > to the experts. Friedman, Manly, and Tiltman as well as others in the
know
> > who have examined the VMS would probably have detected this in a flash.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dana Scott
> >
>
> What exactly are you implying? That it's pointless to try and solve this
> problem as an amateur?
>
> I feel with the VM we are in a dilemma, since for all we know, the
encoding
> scheme can't be that terribly complicated. OTOH, all the simple schemes we
> tried seem to fail.
>
> I hadn't heard about the running code being tested before, so I thought it
> might be worthwhile to try it and present results, even if they're
negative.
>
> Cheers,
>
>    Elmar
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> debitel.net Webmail
> ______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list