[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: Re: Re: Word distribution

To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VMs: Re: Re: Word distribution
From: Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:28:06 +0000
In-reply-to: <001801c403e1$b81ab720$0100a8c0@jeff>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20040305190229.00b46d60@pop3.vistamaresoft.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20040305101935.00b46318@pop3.vistamaresoft.com> <Law11-F100OmmuoqfyH0003a62c@hotmail.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20040305190229.00b46d60@pop3.vistamaresoft.com> <5.2.1.1.0.20040306122049.03ef1a80@pop3.blueyonder.co.uk>
Reply-to: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi everyone,

At 01:15 07/03/2004 +0000, Jeff wrote:

In my own opinion I believe Nick is 100% correct here so beware! Words
instance counts ARE unusually low.

I knew my luck was too good to last... :-)

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list

References:
- Re: VMs: Blanks: trying to summarize...
  - From: Maurizio M. Gavioli
- VMs: Blanks: trying to summarize...
  - From: Maurizio M. Gavioli
- RE: VMs: Blanks
  - From: Philip Neal
- VMs: Re: Word distribution
  - From: Nick Pelling
- VMs: Re: Re: Word distribution
  - From: Jeff

Prev by Date: Re: VMs: Re: Word distribution
Next by Date: Re: VMs: D'Imperio
Previous by thread: VMs: Re: Re: Word distribution
Next by thread: Re: VMs: Re: Re: Word distribution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread