[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Delurking (was Re: VMs: Further investigatio of folio f1r)

From: <illumin8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 07 April 2004 01:44

> Jan wrote:
> >
> > So what it was it that eluded the solution for so long and made us so
blind? I know this is
> > mainly philosophical question, but here are only two answers: a) it is
something we
> > half-checked and discarded, or b) something completely new.
> >
> Ding ding ding! You've won the prize. ;)
> I have never read anything that disproves the Brumbaugh (Most Mysterious
> Manuscript pg. 118 ) multimodal alphanumeric cipher:
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
> A B C D E F G H I
> J K L M N O P Q US
>   R   S   T   U
> V   W   X   Y   Z
> In fact I've never read any number-crunching study that even takes it
> into account. What I HAVE read in the archives (by search) is that the
> Crypto camp doesn't like it cuz it's too messy and lossy. I consider it
> elegant and simple. Sure, there's GOT to be another cipher level below
> the deciphered uninflected Latin repeats... like a Bacon cipher?
> Personally, I'm still in the transliteration and 1st level decipher
> stage.
> illumin8

There is only 1 method used. That is DEFINATE! Only 1 level! To see more
than this misses the obvious.


P.S. You may think I'm crazy for being so certain. Go review GC's emails,
take a look at Jon Grove's VMS text generator mehod. These two endeavours
will yield much. However you will still be missing pieces of the puzzle at
that point.

To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list