Re: Delurking (was Re: VMs: Further investigatio of folio f1r)

["Jeff" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: <illumin8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 07 April 2004 01:44


> Jan wrote:
> >
> > So what it was it that eluded the solution for so long and made us so
blind? I know this is
> > mainly philosophical question, but here are only two answers: a) it is
something we
> > half-checked and discarded, or b) something completely new.
> >
> Ding ding ding! You've won the prize. ;)
>
> I VOTE A)
> I have never read anything that disproves the Brumbaugh (Most Mysterious
> Manuscript pg. 118 ) multimodal alphanumeric cipher:
>
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
> A B C D E F G H I
> J K L M N O P Q US
>   R   S   T   U
> V   W   X   Y   Z
>
> In fact I've never read any number-crunching study that even takes it
> into account. What I HAVE read in the archives (by search) is that the
> Crypto camp doesn't like it cuz it's too messy and lossy. I consider it
> elegant and simple. Sure, there's GOT to be another cipher level below
> the deciphered uninflected Latin repeats... like a Bacon cipher?
> Personally, I'm still in the transliteration and 1st level decipher
> stage.
>
>
> illumin8
>

There is only 1 method used. That is DEFINATE! Only 1 level! To see more
than this misses the obvious.

Jeff

P.S. You may think I'm crazy for being so certain. Go review GC's emails,
take a look at Jon Grove's VMS text generator mehod. These two endeavours
will yield much. However you will still be missing pieces of the puzzle at
that point.


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list