Re: VMs: Voynich images and wiki

[Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Seth, Nick,

> at the moment my links point to content mirrored
> on a very fast server, but I'm not entirely certain
> that's "kosher".
> Perhaps it would be better to link directly to the
> Beinecke server
> instead?  I felt bad that we were hammering their
> system so much,
> but perhaps they would prefer it that way.  

We should ask. It was considered bad form (at least
in the past) to include massive links to images
at other people's web sites.

> At any rate, I think it's important to acknowledge 
> how grateful we are at every possible
> opportunity!

Yes.

> Perhaps we should decide on a "De facto standard"
> wiki site now, and all start using it.
> All in favor?

Yes.

A separate entry for each page seems necessary 
due to the potentially large amount of information
(as hinted already by Nick).

Apart from that, I stress again that imposing too
much structure will simply stop the thing from
happening because we will never agree on what that
structure should be like. I see this like a 
scrap book. 
The structure will come since people will naturally
group related information together.
At least that's what I expect :-)

The material from Stolfi's interlinear, the 
various web sites, Petersen's copy, etc etc will
find its way there....

I also think that differing opinions on various
items are very welcome, as long as there are
some minimal justifications given.

Cheers, Rene


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list