[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: Possible explanation for Quire 20...

Rene Zandbergen wrote:
--- Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yet Quire 20 doesn't apparently fit this pattern:-
(1) the quire signature is in the wrong place
(2) the quire signature is on the wrong page

Agreed on both counts!
Am I missing something?  Isn't the 9th quire signature at the beginning of the quire as opposed to the end?  Also, since it is not on the binding edge, it differs from the rest.  Is this due to the Rosetta foldout?  I assume this is an element of the quire order debate.